P4C - Philosophy for Children - has been gaining momentum in primary schools internationally over a number of years. It aims to make children think, and to consider The Big Questions, to which there are often (always?) no right answers. It's not to be confused with PSHE, where there usually are right answers.
Picture books are often used as a starting point for philosophical questioning and discussion, and here's a link to Barry Hymer's recommendations for doing just that:
http://www.wandsworthclc.org/p4c/documents/60stimuli.pdf
Starting out
To get children started, focus on these three key skills -
- Listening
- Giving examples e.g. I feel happy when…
- Giving Reasons e.g. because…for…so..
Builidng up - stage 1
Build on the early work by next introducing and working on these areas:
- Questions/statements
- Building on others’ ideas e.g. What else could we say? How could we make it better?
- Summarising e.g. retelling a story; What have we learned today?
- Reflection e.g. What have you enjoyed? What went well, Even Better If
- Similarities and Differences between concrete objects
Stage 2
- Grouping questions e.g. These are about setting; these are about character
- Open and closed questions
- Making connections in discussions e.g. linking ideas in circle time
- Explanations e.g. How?
Stage 3
- Different points of view links well to history, RE and literacy
- Different types of questions who, when, what, why, how, which
- Listing criteria
- Definitions e.g. What do we mean by disappointment? It is when…
- Similes using ‘like’ and ‘as…as’ e.g. I felt like I would explode ; as white as a shee
- Counter examples differences of opinion
Stage 4
- Alternative possibilities e.g. We could do this…or that
- Distinctions
- Analogies e,g, It’s like when…; It’s like making glue run uphill
- Similarities and differences between abstract concepts
And now for some practical ideas:
Generating questions
You may already know Robert Fisher's books about developing thinking skills. They have some useful short stories that can be used for Philosophy, but instead of using the questions Fisher lists, I'd recommend asking the children to generate their own. (You can do this with any book you may use). Ask them:
- What do you wonder about this story?
- What do you want to know more about?
List these and ask the children which one they want to go on and talk about. You can give them a few minutes to start discussing with a partner or a small group before bringing their thoughts to the whole class for further debate. Remember - there are no right or wrong answers! It's down to opinion supported by good reasons!
Real/Not Real
This idea is one of Phil Cam's, an Australian academic who has written widely on Philosophy for children. It's a great game to use as an introduction to getting even very young children to think philosophically - they have to give reasons for their choices, and the magic word here is 'because'.
Prepare a set of cards, each with the name of something or someone that might or might not be real but which isn't necessarily easily explained, so you might have: Father Christmas, fairies, heaven, dreams, ghosts, rainbows, dinosaurs, elves, monsters, angels, dragons, magic, etc. Give pairs or threes any card at random, for them to discuss and decide whether their item is Real or Not Real. (With very young children you can do this as a whole class). It doesn't matter if they can't agree. Reassure them that there are no right or wrong answers - this is entirely their opinion, but they must be able to justify their choice
Next, they place their card along a line, maybe on the floor, with bigger cards marked 'Real' at one end and 'Not Real' at the opposite end. They put their card nearest to what they decided. If they can't agree, they put it in the middle. Then you start a discussion, asking why they made their choices - they must use the word 'because' in their explanation. . You will be surprised at the depth of thinking many children achieve with this excercise. Encourage further discussion from the rest of the class, asking what they think about their peers' choices.